<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Web Performance on Eknix — Web security &amp; performance for the enterprise</title><link>https://www.eknix.com/tags/web-performance/</link><description>Recent content in Web Performance on Eknix — Web security &amp; performance for the enterprise</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>© {year} EKNIX LTD. All rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.eknix.com/tags/web-performance/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>How Page Latency Kills Ecommerce Revenue in 2026 (And How to Fix It)</title><link>https://www.eknix.com/blog/latency-ecommerce-revenue/</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.eknix.com/blog/latency-ecommerce-revenue/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Speed is not a feature. It is revenue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That framing still surprises some CTOs when we use it in a first meeting. Performance has traditionally lived in the engineering team, treated as a quality metric or a technical concern, something you optimise when you have spare sprint capacity. Finance does not talk about it. The board does not ask about it. It does not appear on the P&amp;amp;L.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Except it does. It appears indirectly, in conversion rates, in average order value, in cart abandonment, in paid acquisition efficiency. And the relationship between milliseconds and money is well-documented enough at this point that treating performance as a secondary concern is, plainly, a commercial mistake.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>